An Analysis of the Correlation Between Socioeconomic Status and Obesity Essay

scrap hypothesis is based exclusively in forcefulness and how those in power do all they can to get to the majority of the population d hold and to bear on them from gaining power, so as to secure their decl be position. negate theorists would say that corpulency is a product of the living conditions, stress and low-down quality of nourishment and health study. corpulency is seen as deviant and problematic and wherefore conflicts with the ideal order of magnitude of creation vista and thin. The more pear-shaped the less power and stature you have in society.Conflict theorists efficiency say that those that argon in power, law makers, Fortune 500 chief executive officers, for example, make cheaper good, make goods more unhealthy, and so the poor office only be able to afford cheap, unhealthy bag food and become susceptible to fleshiness. Conflict theorists might say that food education might be controlled by larger government forces, for example the Food and do drugs Administration and the United States De whilement of Agriculture. These are the members of society who look out for their own bottom line and corporate interests from sponsors and lobbyists.They might limit education about food intake and what is healthy and unhealthy, they might aim certain foods like beef or milk is healthy to appeal to the dairy farm industry, to keep our politicians funded with billions of dollars in donations. There is overly the line of reasoning that by keeping citizenry cogent it allows for discrimination at work, in which they moldiness(prenominal) work harder at get raises because they cannot keep up with their thinner counterparts. orotund people have difficulty with their companionable lives and early death and numerous health complications that might further ensure the experimental condition of the powerful few at the nobble of the food chain.The Structural Functionalism theory argument is that obesity is a necessary part of society. Functionalists major argument is that everything that exists must have a meaning and must be useful towards society as a whole. Functionalists might argue that obese people will go concern to the problems in health care and obesity might help in doctrine those in power more our worked up connection to food and to further research mans relationship with take in and nourishment.The obese population might pep up others to be healthier and might tell and educate society as a whole about the dangers of obesity and its general impact. Functionalist would say that to the obese would be bring an overall bene tick to society. The symbolic interactionist theory demonstrates the effects towards obese people when they disembodied spirit they are being perceived in a negative or unflattering way. The verbal and nonverbal cues that a fit or thin person demonstrates might create an obese person to take out even further from society and or turn to food as a coping mechanism thereby chan ge magnitude weight.Obesity is most correlated to complaisant discrimination and a feeling of being unworthy or weak due to the inability to resist food, for personal and activated reasons. Obesity in society is a symbol of unhealthiness and unattractiveness which produces feelings of disgust, but obesity is a symbol in and of itself because our society makes us associate those things with obesity. There are cultures and societies around the world where being obese means status and power and it was seen as sexy and desirable. Everything we do is socially constructed as is our reactions and treatment of obese people.